- Contraception Preamble
- Contraception: Why Not?
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 2)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 3)
- Contraception Intermission
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 4)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 5)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 6)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 7)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 8)
- Contraception Intermission
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 9)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 10)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 11)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 12)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 13)
- Contraception Intermission
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 14)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 15)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 16)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 17)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 18)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 19)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 20)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 21)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 22)
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 23)
- Why God Creates
This post is part of a series by Professor Janet E. Smith.
Slide: Monkeys and Contraception
There is an amazing study reported from a book by a man named Lionel Tiger. Lionel Tiger is an anthropologist from Rutgers University who studies animal behavior to explain human behavior. He works with a colleague named Robin Fox, who also is an anthropologist who studies animal behavior to explain human behavior. In the 1960’s, as he saw contraception becoming more and more popular, he speculated that male/female relationships would change radically. He did a study in the early ‘70’s that involved a tribe of monkeys. The alpha monkey of this tribe, named Austin, chose three female monkeys to be his exclusive sexual partners. Austin had a grand time with these three female monkeys. Then the researchers injected Austin’s three females with the contraceptive Depo-Provera. Austin stopped having sex with them and chose other female monkeys to be his sexual partners. Then they contracepted all of the females in the tribe. The males stopped having sex with the females and started behaving in a turbulent and confused manner.
Male monkeys at least evidently prefer intercourse with fertile females. Studies also show that males – human males — produce more testosterone when they are around women who have fertile cycles. In fact, men are more attracted to women when they are fertile and women are more attracted to men when the women are fertile.
Once when I mentioned this at a talk in Kansas, a man came up to me and said, “In Kansas, we don’t need studies to show that males are more interested in females when they’re fertile.” He said everyone in Kansas grows up on a farm and we know that when a bull is in a pen with a cow who is not fertile, he is not at all interested. But if the bull is in a barn a mile away with metal fences in between, the bull will get to the cow when she is fertile.
Tiger speculates that one of the reasons that women are dressing so immodestly is because they’re not attracting men because of their fertility. They have to act as though they will do bizarre things in order to attract a male. They aren’t attracting them simply by their fertility since they are not having fertile cycles.
Tiger also reports on a study involving tee shirts. The study included two groups of human females, one contracepting, one not contracepting. It also involved a group of males who had been rated for their evolutionary desirability. Men who are evolutionarily desirable are healthy and aggressive and responsible; the other group included those who can’t hold a job, etc. These men all wore a tee shirt for a day. At the end of the day the women smelled the tee shirts. Without meeting the males the non contracepting women chose the evolutionarily desirable males as potentially attractive mates; the contracepting women chose the losers.
Mothers have approached me after my talk and said, “That explains a lot. It explains why my daughter is stuck with that loser.” Other women say, “Now I understand why my son, who is such a marvelous young man, seems to be having trouble finding good young women.”
Slide: Contraceptive may kill libido
Here we have an article that says contraception may kill libido. As mentioned, one of the side effects of contraceptives is that it reduces a woman’s sex drive. Testosterone is also the source of a female’s sexual drive and women who are using chemical contraceptives do not produce as much testosterone as when they are not contracepting.
Here we read that:
- When women on the Pill were tested, levels of a chemical that wipes out testosterone were found to be seven times higher than in those who had never taken it.
- Most worryingly, even those who were not on the Pill, but had taken it in the past, had levels up to four times higher than those who had never used it.
- Past studies had suggested taking the Pill could dampen a woman’s sexual desire, but that if she came off it, her libido would return within a month.
- Dr Goldstein, former director of the Institute for Sexual Medicine at Boston University, Massachusetts, said that while his research seemed to suggest the effects could be permanent, more investigations were needed.
The website NBC10.com has featured a video that reported this information that the Pill reduces a woman’s sex drive. So, of course, the solution to this problem was what? Give women shots of testosterone. Don’t take them off the Pill: give them shots of testosterone. What a great idea!

Related posts:
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 15) This post is part of a series by Professor Janet...
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 11) This post is part of a series by Professor Janet...
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 8) This post is part of a series by Professor Janet...
- Contraception Intermission Another catchy title eh? As I stated in “Contraception Preamble“,...
- Contraception: Why Not? (part 3) This post is part of a series by Professor Janet...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
I am SO IN!!! LOL
This one was TOTALLY interesting and explains so much.